China Ends Dumping, Pushes Plastics Recycling in West

Katarzyna Kosior

IHS Inc, June 20, 2014

European goal is zero plastics waste going to landfills by 2020; part of discussion at Polyethylene-Polypropylene Chain Global Tech/Business Forum, 25 -26 June in Zurich

LONDON (June 20, 2014) – Despite the fact that Europe is a global leader in plastics recycling and in diverting plastics from landfills by using waste-to-energy programs that convert waste into power generation, Europe, along with many other industrialized regions, recently  got another major incentive to increase its recycling effectiveness for plastics—the message that China no longer wants to be the world’s dumping ground for plastic waste, according to research from IHS (NYSE: IHS), the leading global source of critical information and insight.

As a result, says IHS, recyclers in Europe and other countries such as the U.S., Canada, Japan, Brazil, Mexico and Australia, must improve their recycling technology processes as China, once the final destination for more than 70 percent of the world’s plastic waste, strengthens its ‘green fencing’ regulations to restrict types of plastic waste materials it will accept. China is the world’s largest consumer of recycled plastics, but relies heavily on imports—it imported 10.3 billion metric tons in 2012 according to IHS.

“China is increasingly concerned over degradation to its environment,” said Jim Glauser, specialty chemicals analyst at IHS Chemical and author of a report on plastics recycling. “The country has rejected shipments of waste deemed contaminated or unsuitable and officials are cracking down on hazardous materials that eventually go to Chinese landfills,” he said. Exporters of plastic waste have to improve their recycling processes, since fewer alternative markets exist to accept this waste, and frankly, much of the plastic still has significant value through reuse or energy recovery.”

China’s Green Fencing initiative, Glauser said, has turned the global recycling industry on its head. “Much of the plastic scraps once destined for China are now being exported elsewhere, and the global recycling equipment industry is working to expand its automation to improve waste sorting. Plastic manufacturers and producers of plastic goods are evaluating design guidelines to increase recyclability. One idea is the concept of resin markers, which would help recyclers assess contents of plastic waste to makes sorting easier. China also has an opportunity to grow its domestic recycling.” 

The issue of recycling, along with other aspects of the chemical industry in Europe, will be addressed at the upcoming 22nd Annual Polyethylene-Polypropylene Chain Global Technology and Business Forum, June 25-26, 2014, in Zurich.

Driven by densely populated areas, declining available landfill space, increasingly stringent regulatory policies and incentives to recycle plastic and other materials, Europe has long been a leader in waste recycling. In 2012, European plastics recycling and energy recovery reached 61.9 percent, broken down that amounts to 26.3 percent plastics recycling, 35.6 percent energy recovery, with the remaining 38.1 percent going to landfill.  During 2006 to 2012, said IHS, the average amount of plastics post-consumer waste generated in Europe was 25 million metric tons (MMT).  

However, there are huge discrepancies in Europe with regard to plastics recycling. Seven European Union (EU) countries, plus Norway and Switzerland, have introduced landfill bans for plastic waste, while another 10 EU member states landfill more than 60 percent of their plastic waste, according to the European Chemical Industry Council. Many Eastern European countries rely entirely on landfills to dispose of plastic waste.

In 2012, according to IHS, 82 percent of recycled plastics in Europe were plastic packaged products. The overall recovery of plastic packaging waste was more than 69 percent in 2012. In total, approximately 34 percent of plastic packaging waste was mechanically recycled, while 0.5 percent went to feedstock recycling and nearly 35 percent was used for energy recovery. These 5.4 MMTs destined for energy recovery went to both incineration plants and as refuse-derived-fuel. In 2012, around 26 percent of total post-consumer plastic waste in Europe was collected for mechanical recycling, 0.3 percent went to feedstock recycling and nearly 36 percent went for energy recovery. 

PlasticsEurope, an association of plastics manufacturers, is advocating for a ban on the landfilling of high-calorific plastic waste by 2020, which would prevent nearly 10 MMT of plastic waste from going into a landfill each year (equates to about 9 billion euros per year). Initially, the countries of key focus for the project would be the UK, Italy, Spain, France and Poland. The European goal is to have zero plastics going into a landfill, which “is an ambitious goal,” Glauser said, “but many policymakers are realizing that plastics and other calorific waste are too valuable to send to a landfill.”

Since the increasing global substitution of plastics for other types of materials will keep plastic waste in the public spotlight for many years to come, Glauser said, what will likely have to happen, “is that incentives must be made or more laws must be passed to stimulate higher quality recycling by extending collection and sorting services, and by keeping both recycling and energy recovery as viable alternatives to landfill.”

For this to happen in Europe and elsewhere, he said, “recycling processes must improve—we have to improve the collection, sorting and processing of these plastic wastes from a cost and quality point of view. Plastics that cannot be sustainably recycled should be used for energy recovery rather than sent to a landfill.”

Part of the challenge for recyclers, Glauser said, is that there is an unrelenting introduction of new plastic packaging materials with unique compositions tailored to provide superior performance characteristics for specific applications, which contributes to the increasing technical complexity of plastics recycling. Cost is also a big issue, he said. “A big part of what facilitates recycling programs is the cost of producing of new materials versus recycled material costs. According to our Competitive Cost and Margin Analysis Service at IHS Chemical, in Europe, producers face some of the highest linear low-density polyethylene product costs, so the cost analysis of recycled plastic versus virgin chemical is comparable if not in favor of recycling.”

“The U.S. relies heavily on landfill,” said Glauser. “Approximately 75 to 80 percent of its plastic waste goes into landfills, while Japan disposes of more than half of its plastics waste by incineration. Western Europe uses a combination of both, including making the consumer pay for rubbish, as an incentive to recycle. Much of Western Europe and Japan view incineration as a valid recycling option.”

For more information on the IHS Chemical 22nd Annual Polyethylene-Polypropylene Chain Global Technology and Business Forum, June 25-26, 2014, in Zurich, please contact http://www.ihs.com/events/ihs/pepp-jun-2014.aspx. To speak with Jim Glauser, please contact Melissa.Manning@ihs.com, or press@ihs.com. Media are invited to cover the event, but must submit credentials in advance, by contacting Katarzyna.Kosior@ihs.com.

###

About IHS (www.ihs.com)

IHS (NYSE: IHS) is the leading source of information, insight and analytics in critical areas that shape today’s business landscape. Businesses and governments in more than 165 countries around the globe rely on the comprehensive content, expert independent analysis and flexible delivery methods of IHS to make high-impact decisions and develop strategies with speed and confidence. IHS has been in business since 1959 and became a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange in 2005. Headquartered in Englewood, Colorado, USA, IHS is committed to sustainable, profitable growth and employs more than 8,000 people in 31 countries around the world.

 

IHS is a registered trademark of IHS Inc. All other company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners. © 2014 IHS Inc. All rights reserved.

Related Posts

5 Issues/yr — $25 print; $15 digital