Canada Not Safe From Disease

Mad Cow disease is not to be taken lightly, but so far, our precautionary measures have been woefully inadequate.

The Canadian Health Coalition, Fact Sheets 1, 2, & 3

Mad Cow disease, Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), is a fatal brain-wasting disease in cattle, which was first identified in the United Kingdom (UK) in 1986. The disease has an incubation period lasting four to five years, but ultimately is fatal for cattle within weeks of its onset.1

Cows are not cannibals, they are herbivores, and should be eating grass, not animal by products.

BSE is one of a number of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (TSEs)–a family of diseases in humans and animals which are characterized by sponge-like lesions in the brain. Other examples of TSEs are found in sheep, deer, elk, mink, and even the feline species. In deer and elk, TSE is commonly referred to as "Chronic Wasting Disease," and in sheep the disease is known as "scrapie." It is believed that cattle in Britain developed BSE as a result of being fed the rendered carcasses of dead sheep infected with "scrapie."

As of December 2000, approximately 180,000 cases of Mad Cow disease were confirmed in the UK2. Cases of BSE have since been confirmed in cattle in Belgium, Denmark, France, Ireland, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, and Italy.3

How is Mad Cow Disease spread?
Epidemiological studies conducted in the UK suggest it is spread through cattle feed prepared from carcasses of other ruminants–any of a group of even-toed, hoofed, cud-chewing mammals, including cattle, deer, and elk. No one knows for sure how the first cows got BSE, but we know it spread throughout Britain and eventually the world through the cannibalistic practice of making cattle feed from the bits of cattle (offal) that are not fed to humans. Like a "chain-letter," offal from a BSE cow infected many more cattle, and the offal of those cattle infected many more.

There is a great deal of speculation as to the original cause of BSE. According to the widely-held "prion theory," the BSE agent is composed largely, if not entirely, of a self-replicating protein referred to as a "prion."

Another theory suggests the agent is virus-like, and possesses nucleic acids which carry genetic information. Strong evidence collected over the past decade supports the prion theory, but the ability of the BSE agent to form multiple strains is more easily explained by a virus-like agent.

According to British Customs figures, more than 200,000 tons of potentially contaminated feed were exported around the world.4

The UK Sunday Times recently reported that Prosper de Mulder, Britain's largest rendering company, exported potentially contaminated material to Canada.5,6 In a recent world wide alert, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization reported that meat and bone meal from Europe was imported by more than 100 countries since 1986, including Canada,7 and added, "All countries which have imported cattle or meat and bone meal that originated from Western Europe, during and since the 1980s, can therefore be considered at risk from the disease."8

In December, 2000, the World Health Organization issued a warning of Global Exposure to BSE and urged that "all countries must prohibit the use of ruminant tissues in ruminant feed." In other words–stop cannibalistic feeding practices. Cattle are herbivores and should not be fed rendered animals.

Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease
New variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), or "human Mad Cow disease," is a fatal brain-wasting disease. Characterized by dementia and loss of motor control, this hideous disease was first identified in the United Kingdom in 1996. It is widely accepted in the scientific community that the most likely cause of vCJD is from exposure to the BSE agent via "dietary contamination by affected bovine central nervous system tissue," or in simpler terms, from eating infected meat.9

Originally, it was believed BSE could not jump from cattle to humans. The hypothesis of a link between vCJD and BSE was first raised because of the association of these two in time and place. Experts quickly observed that the agent responsible for vCJD is consistent with the agent that causes Mad Cow disease in cattle. In other words, it was the same disease.10 Scientific studies have since confirmed that vCJD and BSE are indeed the same disease.11

vCJD is classified as a Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy (TSE) because of characteristic spongy degeneration of the brain. The first person known to develop symptoms of what turned out to be vCJD became ill in 1994. Early in the illness, patients usually experience psychiatric symptoms, which most commonly take the form of depression or, less often, a schizophrenia-like psychosis. Early in the illness, unusual sensory symptoms, including "stickiness" of the skin, are experienced in approximately half of all cases. Neurological degeneration, including unsteadiness, difficulty walking, and involuntary movements, occurs as the illness progresses. By the time of death, patients are completely immobile and mute.

vCJD is often confused with CJD, or "Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease," another brain-wasting human TSE disease which causes sponge-like degeneration of the brain. However, CJD, which afflicts approximately one in a million people worldwide, is caused by a hereditary predisposition.

How many people will get vCJD?
According to Mad Cow disease expert Dr. Steven Dealer, "like cattle, thousands–perhaps millions–of people may have been infected" before the disease was first identified in 1996.12 As of December 2000, vCJD has claimed the lives of 87 people.

What worries Dr. Dealer is the alarming increase in new cases being diagnosed. There were 15 people diagnosed with vCJD in 1999 and 42 more diagnosed in 2000. This is a 300% increase over a one-year period, and new cases are now being reported to be increasing 20% per month.12 Because no one knows the length of the incubation period, which is currently speculated to range from one to 30 years, it is uncertain how many people were ultimately infected.14

Is Canada safe?
Canada actually imported a live cow with Mad Cow disease back in 1993. However, according to Dr. Claude Lavigne, an official from Canada's Food Inspection Agency (CFIA), Mad Cow disease is "a European Disease and that's about it."15 Officials from the Geneva-based World Health Organisation (WHO) disagree. The WHO has concluded that Mad Cow disease is a global disease and "no country is immune."15 In fact, Germany, France, Belgium, and Italy had all recently pronounced they were "free" of Mad Cow disease. Mad Cow disease has now been documented in all those countries.17

Mad Cow disease has a four-to-five-year incubation period in cattle. According to Michael Hansen, a Mad Cow expert with the Consumers Union in New York, dozens of countries around the world who imported potentially contaminated animal feed from Europe, including Canada and the US, may already have the fatal disease in their herds and simply aren't aware yet.18 According to Hansen, governments insist they have erected a "fire wall" against Mad Cow disease, but in reality it's "more like a white picket fence."19

Last year in Canada, only 900 cattle were tested for Mad Cow disease.20 That is less than 0.0001 percent of Canada's beef cattle herd, which numbers 11,000,000. 22 To put this in perspective, the government of France is testing 20,000 cattle per week. Maybe we aren't looking because we are afraid of what we might find. According to government sources, the only cattle being checked for Mad Cow disease are those that display neuro-degenerative behaviour. This is problematic because not all cattle carrying the BSE agent exhibit the trademark brain-wasting symptoms.23

Feeding us lies
The CFIA contends it is taking every precaution to keep Mad Cow disease out of Canada. The US Food and Drug Administration recently admitted that only 2,700 of 9,500 rendering plants inspected were complying with regulations designed to keep Mad Cow disease out.24 Last year alone, Canada imported 15.5 million kilograms of meat by products from the US. Canada also imported 125,000 kilograms of British meat and bone meal in the 1990s after it had been identified as a likely cause of Mad Cow disease.25, 26

Statistics Canada import data of potentially contaminated meat & bone meal feed materials (1996-2000)


Time period after which "BSE risk" established

Furthermore, Statistics Canada documentation shows that between 1990-2000, Canada continued to import millions of kilograms of potentially contaminated meat and bone meal (MBM) from the UK and European countries. Shockingly, over 2.8 million kilograms of this potentially contaminated material was imported after 1996–after the risk of Mad Cow disease had been identified.27 This contradicts recent claims by Agriculture Minister Lyle Vanclief, who categorically denied that Canada ever imported bone meal from countries known to have Mad Cow disease.

"Never," said Vanclief outside the Commons. "Canada has not imported meat and bone meal from the European Union."28, 29

Despite the reality that Mad Cow disease is spreading around the world, federal regulators have not taken preventative measures to protect Canada. The wilful blindness that characterized Health Canada's approach to the handling of the hazard of blood contamination in the past is clearly being repeated today.30

Health Canada officials have responded to the Mad Cow threat by saying they have set up a committee to "review" the situation, and added: "We're not worried." 31

History repeats Itself
When Mad Cow disease started to sweep across Britain, government officials went to extremes to hide it from the public. For six months, there was an embargo on publishing information about Mad Cow disease. When information started to leak out, the British government told the public "trust us" and went to great lengths to convey the false impression that Mad Cow disease was not transmissible to humans and thus posed no threat.32 Eventually, the concealment of information stopped and the truth came out. Mad Cow disease was killing people. How many lives would be lost as a consequence of the British government's refusal to take precautionary measures? Has the Canadian government not learned anything from the British experience? Unfortunately, no. Canadian officials are now repeating the same mistakes made by the British Government.

Government must immediately implement an exhaustive testing regime for identifying Mad Cow disease. By only testing 900 cattle a year we are putting Canadians at risk. Like several European countries, we should be testing thousands of cattle a week. Canada should ban meat and bone meal from entering the food chain. Cows are not cannibals. They are herbivores, and should eat grass.

Under Canadian law it is presently legal for cattle to be fed a diet derived from mammal "blood, gelatin, rendered animal fat or their products."33

It is also legal for pigs and chickens, fed on rendered cattle materials, to be rendered and fed back to cattle. This practice must be stopped immediately. In a British experiment, a pig injected with brain material from a "Mad" cow contracted a TSE.34 The World Health Organization and the UN Food & Agriculture Organization are urging countries to ban feeding cattle with ruminant-based feeds, including feed derived from any tissues which comes from deer, elk, and other "road-kill" which may be afflicted with TSE, a close cousin of BSE.

In Canada no such measures have been adopted. It is still common practice for "road-kill" to be sent to the rendering plant to be processed into animal feed, despite the fact that government regulators have documented thousands of Canadian elk with TSE. While scientists don't know if TSEs can be transmitted from elk and deer to people, it is best to err on the side of caution until ongoing scientific studies have been concluded.

Canada should also be deferring blood donations from high-risk groups, such as deer hunters and elk game farmers, who may have contracted a TSE. The federal government should also ban vaccines, medicines, and other health products made from bovine materials. Approximately 400 such products are available in Canada. At the very least, these potentially hazardous products should be clearly labelled so they can be traced back to their origin in the case of a related outbreak.

There are nine common vaccines known to be made with bovine materials, some of which are administered for polio, diphtheria, and tetanus. The New York Times recently reported that despite repeated requests from the US Food and Drug Administration, some of the world's largest drug companies are still using bovine materials from countries known to have Mad Cow disease in their herds.35

A senior official from Health Canada insists they are "studying" the situation, even though he acknowledges that the threat from such bovine-based products "can't be ruled out."36 Officials from Health Canada and the CFIA recently met behind "closed-doors" with cattle industry representatives to discuss the Mad Cow epidemic.37 The refusal to allow public health advocates in the meeting illustrates the collusion between government regulators and the regulated.

Stop CFIA before it stops you
The federal government has been quietly dismantling the Food and Drugs Act and undermining the regulatory responsibilities of the Canadian government in a shift to a "Risk Management" regime–under which illness and death are considered acceptable risks. In his most recent report, Auditor General Denis Desautels concluded that the CFIA is so understaffed that it could not guarantee the safety of Canadian meat.38

Parliament must revoke regulatory responsibilities for food safety from the CFIA and give them to an in-house, independent agency which reports to the Minister of Health. This agency must be provided with ample resources to undertake rigorous inspection based on a precautionary principle framework, not a "manage the damage" Risk Management scheme.

The CFIA is in a clear conflict of interest as both a "promoter" and "regulator" of the agriculture industry. 39, 40 Government regulators must be completely independent from industry. This is paramount.

To paraphrase Justice Krever, government must regulate in the public interest, not in the interest of the regulated.41 There must be an independent public inquiry into the scandalous behaviour of the CFIA and Health Canada. The inquiry should report directly to Parliament, not the Prime Minister's office, and any officials linked to wrong-doing should be prosecuted.

People who knowingly violate the Food & Drugs Act and the Department of Health Act are violating Canada's criminal code and should be held responsible. Accountability saves lives.

Warning: system failure
The Precautionary Principal means that, in the face of scientific uncertainty, one should proceed with caution. Government should not wait for scientific certainty about the spread of a disease before it acts to reduce risks.41 Federal regulators must apply the Precautionary Principle. Risk management is the language of corporations, not public protection.43

If the dire threat of Mad Cow disease doesn't justify taking precautionary measures–what does? When evidence of the dangers of Mad Cow disease first began to appear in Britain, policy makers didn't heed the precautionary principle. Instead of basing their policies on a worst-case scenario, they placated industry and hoped for the best. To quote the memorable words of British epidemiologist Sheila Gore, the British government was playing "Russian Roulette with no information on the odds."44

Let's not let history repeat itself. Let's apply the Precautionary Principle now.

* Footnotes:
1 World Health Organisation, BSE Fact sheet,
2 World Health Organisation, BSE Fact sheet,
3 International Office for Epizootic Diseases,
4 United Press International, Feb. 4, 2001, BSE-contaminated feed said to reach 70 countries
5 The Canadian Press, Sunday, Feb.11, 2001, Canada imported potentially contaminated animal feed, British figures indicate
6 UK government figures indicate that Canada received 30,000 kilograms of meat and bone meal in 1993; 22,000 in 1994; 31,000 in 1995; and 42,000 in 1996, Canadian Press, Sunday, Feb.11, 2001
7 UN Food & Agriculture Organisation Press Release,
8 The Canadian Press, Sunday, Feb.11, 2001
9 The BSE Inquiry, UK, 1999
10 World Health Organization, vCJD Consultations, 1996
11 Scientists first identified pathological features similar to vCJD in the brains of macaque monkeys inoculated with BSE and later established that the transmission characteristics of BSE and vCJD in mice are due to the same causative agent.
12 CBC Radio, BSE expert Dr. Stephen Dealer on vCJD, January 2001
14 From an interview with Dr. Michelle Brill-Edwards, Feb. 12, 2001, Ottawa
15 The Toronto Star, Jan. 20, 2001 Europe's mad cow scare raises Canadian alarms
17 World Health Organisation,
18 The Canadian Press, Feb. 15, 2001, Mad cow infection could be in Canadian beef but not detected: scientists
19 The New York Times, Jan. 28, 2001, Americans wake up to threat of Mad Cow Disease
20 The Canadian Press, Feb. 15, 2001, Canada's mad cow testing falls short: Scientists
22 Government Statistics, Canadian Food Inspection Agency
23 According to David Westaway, a scientist from the University of Toronto, recently on CBC's The National, Mad Cow Disease–Three Part Series, By Kelly Crowe (Part II), February 2001
24 Reuters, Jan. 12, 2001, Some Feed Makers Don't Follow "Mad Cow" rules
25 Britain's UK Customs and Excise Agency
26 Canadian Press, Sunday, Feb. 11, 2001, Canada imported potentially contaminated animal feed, British figures indicate
27 Statistics Canada International Trade Division,
28 Lyle Vanclief, outside the House of Commons, Feb. 9, 2001
29 Canadian Press, Sunday, Feb. 11, 2001
30 Letter to Allan Rock from the Canadian Health Coalition, Jan. 29, 2001, Re: Dereliction of Duty to Protect Canadians from BGSE and vCJD,
31 The National Post, Jan. 27 2001, pg. A15
32 The BSE Inquiry, UK, 1999
33 Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Regulations: Food for Ruminants, Livestock and Poultry (Part XIV), Prohibited Materials
34 BSE/vCJD expert Michael Hansen, PhD, Consumers Union, Consumer Policy Institute, Point of View,
35 The New York Times, Feb. 8, 2001, Five drug makers use material with mad cow link
36 The Ottawa Citizen, Jan. 24, 2001, Beware of bovine by products: experts
37 The Ottawa Citizen, Feb. 17, 2001, Mad cow meeting too cosy: critics, and Calgary Herald, Feb. 17, 2001, Mad cow disease on federal agenda
38 Report of the Auditor General, The Office of the Auditor General of Canada, February 2001, www.oag-
39 The Royal Society of Canada, Elements of Caution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada,
40 Report of the Auditor General, The Office of the Auditor General of Canada, February 2001,
41 Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada by the Honourable Justice Horace Krever: Final Report (Volume 3, Pp. 995, 994)
43 Dr. Michelle Brill-Edwards, Senior Drug Reviewer, Health Canada (1988-1992), Speaking at a Food Safety conference in Ottawa, 1998
44 Sheila Gore, 1996, Bovine Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease? Failures of Epidemiology Must be Remedied

* Canadian Health Coalition, 2841 Riverside Dr, Ottawa, ON K1V 8X7; Fax: 613-521-9638; E-mail:
For More Information About Mad Cow Disease: UN Food & Agriculture Organization; The BSE Inquiry Homepage; World Health Organization; Canadian Health Coalition; Mad Cow Disease Website; National Centre for Infectious Diseases

5 Issues/yr — $25 print; $15 digital