And here we have it — why so many bizarre events are being approved because the “science” seems to indicate it’s ok. The Vancouver Observer r eports on the grizzly hunt in Tsilqotin territory, increased wihtout First Nations consent: 

“A FOI released ministerial briefing note says the total number of grizzlies used to justify the hunt, was actually a hunch.  

“These [bear] estimates are derived from modelling and professional opinion. There have been no DNA or other inventory studies conducted in this area,” Minister Thomson was told in a briefing note.

The [same] minister said Friday:

“With regard to the decision to re-open the Chilcotin to a limited entry hunt in 2014, my decision was based on the best available science. The hunts were re-opened because grizzly population information and trends indicated that a limited hunt was sustainable.”

There is no shame in Mudville.

Can we ask for a little of your time, and some money?

We can’t do this without you. Support independent media and donate a little or a lot – every bit makes a difference. And when you give those precious extra dollars, we treat them as the honour it is and use them carefully to pay for more stories, more distribution of information, and bonus copies to colleges and libraries. Donate $50 or more, and we will publicly thank you in our magazine. And we always thank you from the bottom of our hearts.