Site C to “Rest on Shales”

There is no bedrock at Site C – and the public deserves to know whether it’s safe to anchor a dam in shale

Arthur Hadland

Site C construction site from above, 2017

Site C dam site, 2017 | Photo: jasonwoodhead23 via flickr (modified from original)

The following is an excerpt from an August 30 letter to BC’s Attorney General, the Honourable David Eby, QC

 

Dear Sir:

I am now iterating my request to you to have a public statement by an Independent Professional Engineer that the Site C Project is a safe site for future generations and the downstream citizens should not fear from a potential dam breach such as happened from the Teton Dam in Idaho in 1976.

The written certification by an Independent Professional Engineer is paramount.

This is now critical as in a August 22, 2018 CJDC interview, (Dawson Creek TV), British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (BCHPA) spokesperson Dave Conway confirmed that there is no bedrock at Site C but that the Shaftesbury shale is an adequate anchor for the dam site:

“We know what rock is here … we’re NOT looking for bedrock, the dam is going to rest on shales … and the powerhouse is going to be anchored into the shales.”

I would think that you and the rest of cabinet should be extremely concerned with this revelation at this late date. Due diligence would be to demand surety by a written professional statement that the shales are an adequate substitute for bed-rock. (NOTE: In a report presented to the Canadian Dam Association, dated Oct. 15-20, 2017, these same engineers made the following observation: “moderately weak, flaky to fissile shale interbedded with thin beds of siltstone, sandstone and shale.” Further in April 2018 BCHPA reportedly hired 3 foreign workers, rumoured to be experts from Italy, to find bedrock at all costs. Their findings remain a secret.)

In your role as Solicitor General, it is imperative that you follow the Principles of Accountability, Transparency and Truth. Remember this is tax payer money; the integrity of your office is at stake.

Please answer the following questions:

  1. Why has BCHPA not provided audited financial statements for the past 3 years? This information needs to be provided immediately.
  2. Who were the 3 foreign experts hired in April 2018? What were their findings? (Need to see a report.) How much did they charge the taxpayers of BC?

Please do not pass the buck to your colleagues as my past experience is they operate in a fog of secrecy. Their silence is deafening.

The irresponsible, unsafe and unnecessary Site C project is a convenient vehicle for passing vast amounts of public wealth ($12 Billion) to the boys in the backroom. It needs to be stopped.

Yours truly,
Arthur A Hadland,
August 30, 2018


Arthur Hadland is a farmer and retired agrologist in Baldonnel, BC.

Watershed Sentinel Original Content

Become a supporter of independent media today!

We can’t do it without you. When you support independent reporting, every donation makes a big difference. We’re honoured to accept all contributions, and we use them wisely. Our supporters fund untold stories, new writers, wider distribution of information, and bonus copies to colleges and libraries. Donate $50 or more, and we will publicly thank you in our magazine. Regardless of the amount, we always thank you from the bottom of our hearts.